Review



length brd4 dna fragment  (Addgene inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Addgene inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Addgene inc length brd4 dna fragment
    FIGURE 1: Chromatin binding influences <t>BRD4</t> condensate distribution in living cells. (A) Schematic of BRD4 full-length (FL) and deltaN-terminus (∆N) constructs, as well as PONDR predicted disorder score. (B) From top: Immunofluorescence of endogenous BRD4 protein in cultured human U2OS cells without and with addition of 1 µM JQ1. Exogenous live expression of BRD4FL-mCherry and BRD4∆N-mCherry in the same cell before (−JQ1) and after (+JQ1) addition of 1 µM JQ1. (C) Panel of images of U2OS cells with increasing expression level of BRD4FL-mCherry (same cell −/+ JQ1) or BRD4∆N-mCherry at similar expression levels. (D) Quantification of number and size of BRD4 condensates from immunofluorescence of endogenous, or live expression of BRD4FL-mCherry or BRD4∆N-mCherry, −/+ JQ1. Points represent averages of three biological replicates of 25 cells each within the expression level gate defined in 1C, error bars SEM. Statistical test one-way ANOVA, ****p < 0.0001. (E) Estimated condensate volume measured in the same set of cells expressing BRD4FL-mCherry before (x-axis) and after (y-axis) disruption of chromatin binding through addition of 1 µM JQ1. If condensate volume is not affected, points should lie on the diagonal, indicated by shading.
    Length Brd4 Dna Fragment, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 41 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/length brd4 dna fragment/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 41 article reviews
    length brd4 dna fragment - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Interplay of condensation and chromatin binding underlies BRD4 targeting"

    Article Title: Interplay of condensation and chromatin binding underlies BRD4 targeting

    Journal: Molecular Biology of the Cell

    doi: 10.1091/mbc.e24-01-0046

    FIGURE 1: Chromatin binding influences BRD4 condensate distribution in living cells. (A) Schematic of BRD4 full-length (FL) and deltaN-terminus (∆N) constructs, as well as PONDR predicted disorder score. (B) From top: Immunofluorescence of endogenous BRD4 protein in cultured human U2OS cells without and with addition of 1 µM JQ1. Exogenous live expression of BRD4FL-mCherry and BRD4∆N-mCherry in the same cell before (−JQ1) and after (+JQ1) addition of 1 µM JQ1. (C) Panel of images of U2OS cells with increasing expression level of BRD4FL-mCherry (same cell −/+ JQ1) or BRD4∆N-mCherry at similar expression levels. (D) Quantification of number and size of BRD4 condensates from immunofluorescence of endogenous, or live expression of BRD4FL-mCherry or BRD4∆N-mCherry, −/+ JQ1. Points represent averages of three biological replicates of 25 cells each within the expression level gate defined in 1C, error bars SEM. Statistical test one-way ANOVA, ****p < 0.0001. (E) Estimated condensate volume measured in the same set of cells expressing BRD4FL-mCherry before (x-axis) and after (y-axis) disruption of chromatin binding through addition of 1 µM JQ1. If condensate volume is not affected, points should lie on the diagonal, indicated by shading.
    Figure Legend Snippet: FIGURE 1: Chromatin binding influences BRD4 condensate distribution in living cells. (A) Schematic of BRD4 full-length (FL) and deltaN-terminus (∆N) constructs, as well as PONDR predicted disorder score. (B) From top: Immunofluorescence of endogenous BRD4 protein in cultured human U2OS cells without and with addition of 1 µM JQ1. Exogenous live expression of BRD4FL-mCherry and BRD4∆N-mCherry in the same cell before (−JQ1) and after (+JQ1) addition of 1 µM JQ1. (C) Panel of images of U2OS cells with increasing expression level of BRD4FL-mCherry (same cell −/+ JQ1) or BRD4∆N-mCherry at similar expression levels. (D) Quantification of number and size of BRD4 condensates from immunofluorescence of endogenous, or live expression of BRD4FL-mCherry or BRD4∆N-mCherry, −/+ JQ1. Points represent averages of three biological replicates of 25 cells each within the expression level gate defined in 1C, error bars SEM. Statistical test one-way ANOVA, ****p < 0.0001. (E) Estimated condensate volume measured in the same set of cells expressing BRD4FL-mCherry before (x-axis) and after (y-axis) disruption of chromatin binding through addition of 1 µM JQ1. If condensate volume is not affected, points should lie on the diagonal, indicated by shading.

    Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Construct, Immunofluorescence, Cell Culture, Expressing, Disruption

    FIGURE 2: Thermodynamic effects of BRD4 chromatin binding are measured the Corelet synthetic oligomerization system. Representative images of BRD4FL Corelets before and after light activation of a nucleus without (A) or with (B) 1µM JQ1. (C) Quantification of the number and size of BRD4FL Corelet condensates per nucleus induced with light activation −/+ JQ1 in the same set of nuclei. Error bars represent SEM across four trials of 25 cells each, Student’s t test ***p = 0.0002 in Count, *** p = 0.001 in Area. (D) Condensate volume comparison in −/+JQ1 conditions in the same set of cells with BRD4FL (pink) or BRD4∆N (black) Corelets. BRD4∆N Corelet condensate volume is unaffected by the addition of JQ1, as can be seen from points largely along the diagonal (shaded pink), while BRD4FL Corelet condensate volume is much lower after addition of JQ1. Lines are linear fit. (E, F) Phase diagram and logistic regression of BRD4FL measured with the Corelet system in the absence (E) and presence (F) of JQ1. Phase diagrams are constructed from the same cells expressing BRD4FL −/+ JQ1 demonstrating the shifted valence between −JQ1 (gray) and +JQ1 (pink).
    Figure Legend Snippet: FIGURE 2: Thermodynamic effects of BRD4 chromatin binding are measured the Corelet synthetic oligomerization system. Representative images of BRD4FL Corelets before and after light activation of a nucleus without (A) or with (B) 1µM JQ1. (C) Quantification of the number and size of BRD4FL Corelet condensates per nucleus induced with light activation −/+ JQ1 in the same set of nuclei. Error bars represent SEM across four trials of 25 cells each, Student’s t test ***p = 0.0002 in Count, *** p = 0.001 in Area. (D) Condensate volume comparison in −/+JQ1 conditions in the same set of cells with BRD4FL (pink) or BRD4∆N (black) Corelets. BRD4∆N Corelet condensate volume is unaffected by the addition of JQ1, as can be seen from points largely along the diagonal (shaded pink), while BRD4FL Corelet condensate volume is much lower after addition of JQ1. Lines are linear fit. (E, F) Phase diagram and logistic regression of BRD4FL measured with the Corelet system in the absence (E) and presence (F) of JQ1. Phase diagrams are constructed from the same cells expressing BRD4FL −/+ JQ1 demonstrating the shifted valence between −JQ1 (gray) and +JQ1 (pink).

    Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Activation Assay, Comparison, Construct, Expressing

    FIGURE 3: A coarse-grained model for simulating BRD4 Corelet condensation. (A) Coarse-grained simulations contain representations of the chromatin polymer (blue) and Corelet oligomerization platform (gold) with attached BRD4 molecules, each composed of two spheres representing the N-terminus (capable of interacting with chromatin) and C-terminus (capable of self-interaction). (B) The valence-dependent phase diagram in the absence of chromatin, obtained via direct-coexistence simulation (representative snapshot on left), shows a critical valence-1 of 1/6. C. A phase diagram showing the presence of chromatin-Corelet condensates in simulations with strong chromatin binding (40% acetylated histone tails) predicts an apparent critical valence-1 of 1/2. Representative snapshots are shown (on right) for the indicated simulation conditions. Related simulation data at lower acetylation levels are provided in Supplemental Figure S2F.
    Figure Legend Snippet: FIGURE 3: A coarse-grained model for simulating BRD4 Corelet condensation. (A) Coarse-grained simulations contain representations of the chromatin polymer (blue) and Corelet oligomerization platform (gold) with attached BRD4 molecules, each composed of two spheres representing the N-terminus (capable of interacting with chromatin) and C-terminus (capable of self-interaction). (B) The valence-dependent phase diagram in the absence of chromatin, obtained via direct-coexistence simulation (representative snapshot on left), shows a critical valence-1 of 1/6. C. A phase diagram showing the presence of chromatin-Corelet condensates in simulations with strong chromatin binding (40% acetylated histone tails) predicts an apparent critical valence-1 of 1/2. Representative snapshots are shown (on right) for the indicated simulation conditions. Related simulation data at lower acetylation levels are provided in Supplemental Figure S2F.

    Techniques Used: Polymer, Binding Assay

    FIGURE 4: BRD4 condensate nucleation is seeded on chromatin. (A) Schematic of two modes of condensate nucleation: substrate-seeded (heterogeneous) and not seeded (homogeneous). Without seeding, the free energy of protein clustering increases until the cluster reaches its critical radius (rcrit), at which point it becomes energetically favorable to grow. A seed can lower the energetic barrier to reach rcrit. (B) Seeded nucleation is expected to have a shorter delay time before droplet formation, and increased nucleation rate (slope) compared with nonseeded nucleation. (C) Quantification of the number of condensates nucleated over time in the same cell before and after JQ1 treatment demonstrates the expected changes in delay time and slope. (D) Representative images of a 4 by 4 micron square nuclear area as light-induced BRD4FL-mCh-sspB Corelet condensates nucleate rapidly in untreated conditions (2 s, top), but are delayed in the same cell after JQ1 treatment (10 s, bottom). (E) Quantification of the nucleation rate (slope), delay time, and number density for 9 cells of similar expression level before and after JQ1 treatment. (F) Repeated activation-deactivation cycles of BRD4∆N and overlay of condensate positions in subsequent cycles shows whether nucleation occurs repeatedly in the same nuclear locations. (G) Overlay of condensate positions in subsequent cycles of activation for BRD4FL −/+ JQ1. (H) PCC quantification and difference in PCC (deltaPCC) of overlaid images of 33 cells in subsequent activation cycles. Negative controls are PCCs between images of different cells. ***p = 0.0015 by Mann– Whitney exact, two-tailed t test. (I) Short-term (2 min) 200 nM JQ1 treatment disperses BRD4 condensates (JQ1), yet they form again quickly after washing out JQ1 (Recovery). Segmented masks of identified BRD4 puncta within nuclear outline, overlay of JQ1 and recovery timepoints (green) with pretreatment condensate positions (magenta). (J) Quantification of condensate dissolution during JQ1 treatment (shaded area) and recovery after washout. Error bars represent SD of three biological trials of 10 cells each. (K) Overlay of images before/during JQ1 treatment and before treatment/after JQ1 washout (left). PCC of 30 cells before/during JQ1, and before treatment/after JQ1 washout.
    Figure Legend Snippet: FIGURE 4: BRD4 condensate nucleation is seeded on chromatin. (A) Schematic of two modes of condensate nucleation: substrate-seeded (heterogeneous) and not seeded (homogeneous). Without seeding, the free energy of protein clustering increases until the cluster reaches its critical radius (rcrit), at which point it becomes energetically favorable to grow. A seed can lower the energetic barrier to reach rcrit. (B) Seeded nucleation is expected to have a shorter delay time before droplet formation, and increased nucleation rate (slope) compared with nonseeded nucleation. (C) Quantification of the number of condensates nucleated over time in the same cell before and after JQ1 treatment demonstrates the expected changes in delay time and slope. (D) Representative images of a 4 by 4 micron square nuclear area as light-induced BRD4FL-mCh-sspB Corelet condensates nucleate rapidly in untreated conditions (2 s, top), but are delayed in the same cell after JQ1 treatment (10 s, bottom). (E) Quantification of the nucleation rate (slope), delay time, and number density for 9 cells of similar expression level before and after JQ1 treatment. (F) Repeated activation-deactivation cycles of BRD4∆N and overlay of condensate positions in subsequent cycles shows whether nucleation occurs repeatedly in the same nuclear locations. (G) Overlay of condensate positions in subsequent cycles of activation for BRD4FL −/+ JQ1. (H) PCC quantification and difference in PCC (deltaPCC) of overlaid images of 33 cells in subsequent activation cycles. Negative controls are PCCs between images of different cells. ***p = 0.0015 by Mann– Whitney exact, two-tailed t test. (I) Short-term (2 min) 200 nM JQ1 treatment disperses BRD4 condensates (JQ1), yet they form again quickly after washing out JQ1 (Recovery). Segmented masks of identified BRD4 puncta within nuclear outline, overlay of JQ1 and recovery timepoints (green) with pretreatment condensate positions (magenta). (J) Quantification of condensate dissolution during JQ1 treatment (shaded area) and recovery after washout. Error bars represent SD of three biological trials of 10 cells each. (K) Overlay of images before/during JQ1 treatment and before treatment/after JQ1 washout (left). PCC of 30 cells before/during JQ1, and before treatment/after JQ1 washout.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Activation Assay, MANN-WHITNEY, Two Tailed Test, Dissolution

    FIGURE 5: Simulations of BRD4FL Corelet condensation quantify enhancement of chromatin-seeded nucleation. (A) Schematic of a typical nucleation event. τnucl is the time required for cluster size to reach the threshold to form a stable nucleus (red line). τdelay is the time required for the nucleated cluster to grow via diffusion-limited growth to reach a size that is observable under the microscope (green line), which is estimated to be 15 times larger than the stable nucleus size in our simulations. (B) Example of a heterogeneous (on-chromatin) nucleation event, in which the largest cluster (highlighted in red) interacts with the chromatin polymer. (C) Example of a homogeneous (off-chromatin) nucleation event. (D) Probability of on-chromatin (orange) or off-chromatin (blue) nucleation events for endogenous (top) and Corelet (bottom) simulations at two BRD4-histone tail interaction strengths (representing +JQ1 and −JQ1), and four acetylation fractions (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4). (E) Quantification of the nucleation rate in endogenous and Corelet simulations with (−JQ1) and without (+JQ1) strong BRD4-histone tail interactions. (F) Quantification of the delay time before observable condensates are formed in endogenous and Corelet simulation systems with (−JQ1) and without (+JQ1) strong BRD4-histone tail interactions. (E, F) Seven independent simulations for each measurement are run at an acetylation fraction of 0.4 for both +JQ1 and −JQ1. In the +JQ1 Corelet simulations, only two out of seven simulations achieved nucleation. Error bars represent the SE. ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001 by Student’s t test.
    Figure Legend Snippet: FIGURE 5: Simulations of BRD4FL Corelet condensation quantify enhancement of chromatin-seeded nucleation. (A) Schematic of a typical nucleation event. τnucl is the time required for cluster size to reach the threshold to form a stable nucleus (red line). τdelay is the time required for the nucleated cluster to grow via diffusion-limited growth to reach a size that is observable under the microscope (green line), which is estimated to be 15 times larger than the stable nucleus size in our simulations. (B) Example of a heterogeneous (on-chromatin) nucleation event, in which the largest cluster (highlighted in red) interacts with the chromatin polymer. (C) Example of a homogeneous (off-chromatin) nucleation event. (D) Probability of on-chromatin (orange) or off-chromatin (blue) nucleation events for endogenous (top) and Corelet (bottom) simulations at two BRD4-histone tail interaction strengths (representing +JQ1 and −JQ1), and four acetylation fractions (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4). (E) Quantification of the nucleation rate in endogenous and Corelet simulations with (−JQ1) and without (+JQ1) strong BRD4-histone tail interactions. (F) Quantification of the delay time before observable condensates are formed in endogenous and Corelet simulation systems with (−JQ1) and without (+JQ1) strong BRD4-histone tail interactions. (E, F) Seven independent simulations for each measurement are run at an acetylation fraction of 0.4 for both +JQ1 and −JQ1. In the +JQ1 Corelet simulations, only two out of seven simulations achieved nucleation. Error bars represent the SE. ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001 by Student’s t test.

    Techniques Used: Diffusion-based Assay, Microscopy, Polymer

    FIGURE 6: Epigenetic acetylation level influences nucleation behaviors in endogenous and exogenous BRD4 systems. (A) Representative images and analysis examples of endogenous BRD4 puncta by immunofluorescence in cells treated with control media (Control), histone acetyltransferase inhibitor (A485), or histone deacetylase inhibitor (TSA). (B, C) Quantification of endogenous BRD4 condensate count per nucleus (B) and condensate average area (C) measured by immunofluorescence in drug-treated cells. n = 25 cells each, error is SD. ***p = 0.002, ****p = 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA. D. Representative images of BRD4FL-mCh puncta in living cells treated with control media, A485, or TSA at three timepoints: before addition of JQ1 (−JQ1), during JQ1 incubation (+JQ1) and after JQ1 washout and recovery. (E–F) Quantification of the number of condensates per nucleus in drug-treated cells before addition of JQ1 (E) and after washout and recovery (F). Expression range as defined in Supplemental Figure S4, D and E. n = 11, 11, 12 cells, error is SD, *p = 0.031, **p = 0.008 by one-way ANOVA. (G) Timecourse graph of the number of BRD4FL-mCh puncta per nucleus during JQ1 treatment (shaded area) and nucleation after washout. (H) Nucleation rate of BRD4FL-mCh puncta measured as slope after JQ1 washout. N = 11, 11, 12 for A485, control, TSA respectively. **p = 0.006, ****p = 0.001. (I) Model figure summarizing findings about on- and off-chromatin BRD4 nucleation.
    Figure Legend Snippet: FIGURE 6: Epigenetic acetylation level influences nucleation behaviors in endogenous and exogenous BRD4 systems. (A) Representative images and analysis examples of endogenous BRD4 puncta by immunofluorescence in cells treated with control media (Control), histone acetyltransferase inhibitor (A485), or histone deacetylase inhibitor (TSA). (B, C) Quantification of endogenous BRD4 condensate count per nucleus (B) and condensate average area (C) measured by immunofluorescence in drug-treated cells. n = 25 cells each, error is SD. ***p = 0.002, ****p = 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA. D. Representative images of BRD4FL-mCh puncta in living cells treated with control media, A485, or TSA at three timepoints: before addition of JQ1 (−JQ1), during JQ1 incubation (+JQ1) and after JQ1 washout and recovery. (E–F) Quantification of the number of condensates per nucleus in drug-treated cells before addition of JQ1 (E) and after washout and recovery (F). Expression range as defined in Supplemental Figure S4, D and E. n = 11, 11, 12 cells, error is SD, *p = 0.031, **p = 0.008 by one-way ANOVA. (G) Timecourse graph of the number of BRD4FL-mCh puncta per nucleus during JQ1 treatment (shaded area) and nucleation after washout. (H) Nucleation rate of BRD4FL-mCh puncta measured as slope after JQ1 washout. N = 11, 11, 12 for A485, control, TSA respectively. **p = 0.006, ****p = 0.001. (I) Model figure summarizing findings about on- and off-chromatin BRD4 nucleation.

    Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Control, Histone Deacetylase Assay, Incubation, Expressing



    Similar Products

    93
    Addgene inc length brd4 dna fragment
    FIGURE 1: Chromatin binding influences <t>BRD4</t> condensate distribution in living cells. (A) Schematic of BRD4 full-length (FL) and deltaN-terminus (∆N) constructs, as well as PONDR predicted disorder score. (B) From top: Immunofluorescence of endogenous BRD4 protein in cultured human U2OS cells without and with addition of 1 µM JQ1. Exogenous live expression of BRD4FL-mCherry and BRD4∆N-mCherry in the same cell before (−JQ1) and after (+JQ1) addition of 1 µM JQ1. (C) Panel of images of U2OS cells with increasing expression level of BRD4FL-mCherry (same cell −/+ JQ1) or BRD4∆N-mCherry at similar expression levels. (D) Quantification of number and size of BRD4 condensates from immunofluorescence of endogenous, or live expression of BRD4FL-mCherry or BRD4∆N-mCherry, −/+ JQ1. Points represent averages of three biological replicates of 25 cells each within the expression level gate defined in 1C, error bars SEM. Statistical test one-way ANOVA, ****p < 0.0001. (E) Estimated condensate volume measured in the same set of cells expressing BRD4FL-mCherry before (x-axis) and after (y-axis) disruption of chromatin binding through addition of 1 µM JQ1. If condensate volume is not affected, points should lie on the diagonal, indicated by shading.
    Length Brd4 Dna Fragment, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/length brd4 dna fragment/product/Addgene inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    length brd4 dna fragment - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    FIGURE 1: Chromatin binding influences BRD4 condensate distribution in living cells. (A) Schematic of BRD4 full-length (FL) and deltaN-terminus (∆N) constructs, as well as PONDR predicted disorder score. (B) From top: Immunofluorescence of endogenous BRD4 protein in cultured human U2OS cells without and with addition of 1 µM JQ1. Exogenous live expression of BRD4FL-mCherry and BRD4∆N-mCherry in the same cell before (−JQ1) and after (+JQ1) addition of 1 µM JQ1. (C) Panel of images of U2OS cells with increasing expression level of BRD4FL-mCherry (same cell −/+ JQ1) or BRD4∆N-mCherry at similar expression levels. (D) Quantification of number and size of BRD4 condensates from immunofluorescence of endogenous, or live expression of BRD4FL-mCherry or BRD4∆N-mCherry, −/+ JQ1. Points represent averages of three biological replicates of 25 cells each within the expression level gate defined in 1C, error bars SEM. Statistical test one-way ANOVA, ****p < 0.0001. (E) Estimated condensate volume measured in the same set of cells expressing BRD4FL-mCherry before (x-axis) and after (y-axis) disruption of chromatin binding through addition of 1 µM JQ1. If condensate volume is not affected, points should lie on the diagonal, indicated by shading.

    Journal: Molecular Biology of the Cell

    Article Title: Interplay of condensation and chromatin binding underlies BRD4 targeting

    doi: 10.1091/mbc.e24-01-0046

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 1: Chromatin binding influences BRD4 condensate distribution in living cells. (A) Schematic of BRD4 full-length (FL) and deltaN-terminus (∆N) constructs, as well as PONDR predicted disorder score. (B) From top: Immunofluorescence of endogenous BRD4 protein in cultured human U2OS cells without and with addition of 1 µM JQ1. Exogenous live expression of BRD4FL-mCherry and BRD4∆N-mCherry in the same cell before (−JQ1) and after (+JQ1) addition of 1 µM JQ1. (C) Panel of images of U2OS cells with increasing expression level of BRD4FL-mCherry (same cell −/+ JQ1) or BRD4∆N-mCherry at similar expression levels. (D) Quantification of number and size of BRD4 condensates from immunofluorescence of endogenous, or live expression of BRD4FL-mCherry or BRD4∆N-mCherry, −/+ JQ1. Points represent averages of three biological replicates of 25 cells each within the expression level gate defined in 1C, error bars SEM. Statistical test one-way ANOVA, ****p < 0.0001. (E) Estimated condensate volume measured in the same set of cells expressing BRD4FL-mCherry before (x-axis) and after (y-axis) disruption of chromatin binding through addition of 1 µM JQ1. If condensate volume is not affected, points should lie on the diagonal, indicated by shading.

    Article Snippet: The full-length BRD4 DNA fragment was amplified by PCR from pcDNA4-TO-HA-BRD4FL (Addgene plasmid #31351) (Rahman et al., 2011) incorporated into linearized FM5 lentiviral vectors containing 12 | A. R. Strom et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell standardized linkers (generously provided by David Sanders) using the In-Fusion HD cloning kit (Takara Bio, 638910).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Construct, Immunofluorescence, Cell Culture, Expressing, Disruption

    FIGURE 2: Thermodynamic effects of BRD4 chromatin binding are measured the Corelet synthetic oligomerization system. Representative images of BRD4FL Corelets before and after light activation of a nucleus without (A) or with (B) 1µM JQ1. (C) Quantification of the number and size of BRD4FL Corelet condensates per nucleus induced with light activation −/+ JQ1 in the same set of nuclei. Error bars represent SEM across four trials of 25 cells each, Student’s t test ***p = 0.0002 in Count, *** p = 0.001 in Area. (D) Condensate volume comparison in −/+JQ1 conditions in the same set of cells with BRD4FL (pink) or BRD4∆N (black) Corelets. BRD4∆N Corelet condensate volume is unaffected by the addition of JQ1, as can be seen from points largely along the diagonal (shaded pink), while BRD4FL Corelet condensate volume is much lower after addition of JQ1. Lines are linear fit. (E, F) Phase diagram and logistic regression of BRD4FL measured with the Corelet system in the absence (E) and presence (F) of JQ1. Phase diagrams are constructed from the same cells expressing BRD4FL −/+ JQ1 demonstrating the shifted valence between −JQ1 (gray) and +JQ1 (pink).

    Journal: Molecular Biology of the Cell

    Article Title: Interplay of condensation and chromatin binding underlies BRD4 targeting

    doi: 10.1091/mbc.e24-01-0046

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 2: Thermodynamic effects of BRD4 chromatin binding are measured the Corelet synthetic oligomerization system. Representative images of BRD4FL Corelets before and after light activation of a nucleus without (A) or with (B) 1µM JQ1. (C) Quantification of the number and size of BRD4FL Corelet condensates per nucleus induced with light activation −/+ JQ1 in the same set of nuclei. Error bars represent SEM across four trials of 25 cells each, Student’s t test ***p = 0.0002 in Count, *** p = 0.001 in Area. (D) Condensate volume comparison in −/+JQ1 conditions in the same set of cells with BRD4FL (pink) or BRD4∆N (black) Corelets. BRD4∆N Corelet condensate volume is unaffected by the addition of JQ1, as can be seen from points largely along the diagonal (shaded pink), while BRD4FL Corelet condensate volume is much lower after addition of JQ1. Lines are linear fit. (E, F) Phase diagram and logistic regression of BRD4FL measured with the Corelet system in the absence (E) and presence (F) of JQ1. Phase diagrams are constructed from the same cells expressing BRD4FL −/+ JQ1 demonstrating the shifted valence between −JQ1 (gray) and +JQ1 (pink).

    Article Snippet: The full-length BRD4 DNA fragment was amplified by PCR from pcDNA4-TO-HA-BRD4FL (Addgene plasmid #31351) (Rahman et al., 2011) incorporated into linearized FM5 lentiviral vectors containing 12 | A. R. Strom et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell standardized linkers (generously provided by David Sanders) using the In-Fusion HD cloning kit (Takara Bio, 638910).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Activation Assay, Comparison, Construct, Expressing

    FIGURE 3: A coarse-grained model for simulating BRD4 Corelet condensation. (A) Coarse-grained simulations contain representations of the chromatin polymer (blue) and Corelet oligomerization platform (gold) with attached BRD4 molecules, each composed of two spheres representing the N-terminus (capable of interacting with chromatin) and C-terminus (capable of self-interaction). (B) The valence-dependent phase diagram in the absence of chromatin, obtained via direct-coexistence simulation (representative snapshot on left), shows a critical valence-1 of 1/6. C. A phase diagram showing the presence of chromatin-Corelet condensates in simulations with strong chromatin binding (40% acetylated histone tails) predicts an apparent critical valence-1 of 1/2. Representative snapshots are shown (on right) for the indicated simulation conditions. Related simulation data at lower acetylation levels are provided in Supplemental Figure S2F.

    Journal: Molecular Biology of the Cell

    Article Title: Interplay of condensation and chromatin binding underlies BRD4 targeting

    doi: 10.1091/mbc.e24-01-0046

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 3: A coarse-grained model for simulating BRD4 Corelet condensation. (A) Coarse-grained simulations contain representations of the chromatin polymer (blue) and Corelet oligomerization platform (gold) with attached BRD4 molecules, each composed of two spheres representing the N-terminus (capable of interacting with chromatin) and C-terminus (capable of self-interaction). (B) The valence-dependent phase diagram in the absence of chromatin, obtained via direct-coexistence simulation (representative snapshot on left), shows a critical valence-1 of 1/6. C. A phase diagram showing the presence of chromatin-Corelet condensates in simulations with strong chromatin binding (40% acetylated histone tails) predicts an apparent critical valence-1 of 1/2. Representative snapshots are shown (on right) for the indicated simulation conditions. Related simulation data at lower acetylation levels are provided in Supplemental Figure S2F.

    Article Snippet: The full-length BRD4 DNA fragment was amplified by PCR from pcDNA4-TO-HA-BRD4FL (Addgene plasmid #31351) (Rahman et al., 2011) incorporated into linearized FM5 lentiviral vectors containing 12 | A. R. Strom et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell standardized linkers (generously provided by David Sanders) using the In-Fusion HD cloning kit (Takara Bio, 638910).

    Techniques: Polymer, Binding Assay

    FIGURE 4: BRD4 condensate nucleation is seeded on chromatin. (A) Schematic of two modes of condensate nucleation: substrate-seeded (heterogeneous) and not seeded (homogeneous). Without seeding, the free energy of protein clustering increases until the cluster reaches its critical radius (rcrit), at which point it becomes energetically favorable to grow. A seed can lower the energetic barrier to reach rcrit. (B) Seeded nucleation is expected to have a shorter delay time before droplet formation, and increased nucleation rate (slope) compared with nonseeded nucleation. (C) Quantification of the number of condensates nucleated over time in the same cell before and after JQ1 treatment demonstrates the expected changes in delay time and slope. (D) Representative images of a 4 by 4 micron square nuclear area as light-induced BRD4FL-mCh-sspB Corelet condensates nucleate rapidly in untreated conditions (2 s, top), but are delayed in the same cell after JQ1 treatment (10 s, bottom). (E) Quantification of the nucleation rate (slope), delay time, and number density for 9 cells of similar expression level before and after JQ1 treatment. (F) Repeated activation-deactivation cycles of BRD4∆N and overlay of condensate positions in subsequent cycles shows whether nucleation occurs repeatedly in the same nuclear locations. (G) Overlay of condensate positions in subsequent cycles of activation for BRD4FL −/+ JQ1. (H) PCC quantification and difference in PCC (deltaPCC) of overlaid images of 33 cells in subsequent activation cycles. Negative controls are PCCs between images of different cells. ***p = 0.0015 by Mann– Whitney exact, two-tailed t test. (I) Short-term (2 min) 200 nM JQ1 treatment disperses BRD4 condensates (JQ1), yet they form again quickly after washing out JQ1 (Recovery). Segmented masks of identified BRD4 puncta within nuclear outline, overlay of JQ1 and recovery timepoints (green) with pretreatment condensate positions (magenta). (J) Quantification of condensate dissolution during JQ1 treatment (shaded area) and recovery after washout. Error bars represent SD of three biological trials of 10 cells each. (K) Overlay of images before/during JQ1 treatment and before treatment/after JQ1 washout (left). PCC of 30 cells before/during JQ1, and before treatment/after JQ1 washout.

    Journal: Molecular Biology of the Cell

    Article Title: Interplay of condensation and chromatin binding underlies BRD4 targeting

    doi: 10.1091/mbc.e24-01-0046

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 4: BRD4 condensate nucleation is seeded on chromatin. (A) Schematic of two modes of condensate nucleation: substrate-seeded (heterogeneous) and not seeded (homogeneous). Without seeding, the free energy of protein clustering increases until the cluster reaches its critical radius (rcrit), at which point it becomes energetically favorable to grow. A seed can lower the energetic barrier to reach rcrit. (B) Seeded nucleation is expected to have a shorter delay time before droplet formation, and increased nucleation rate (slope) compared with nonseeded nucleation. (C) Quantification of the number of condensates nucleated over time in the same cell before and after JQ1 treatment demonstrates the expected changes in delay time and slope. (D) Representative images of a 4 by 4 micron square nuclear area as light-induced BRD4FL-mCh-sspB Corelet condensates nucleate rapidly in untreated conditions (2 s, top), but are delayed in the same cell after JQ1 treatment (10 s, bottom). (E) Quantification of the nucleation rate (slope), delay time, and number density for 9 cells of similar expression level before and after JQ1 treatment. (F) Repeated activation-deactivation cycles of BRD4∆N and overlay of condensate positions in subsequent cycles shows whether nucleation occurs repeatedly in the same nuclear locations. (G) Overlay of condensate positions in subsequent cycles of activation for BRD4FL −/+ JQ1. (H) PCC quantification and difference in PCC (deltaPCC) of overlaid images of 33 cells in subsequent activation cycles. Negative controls are PCCs between images of different cells. ***p = 0.0015 by Mann– Whitney exact, two-tailed t test. (I) Short-term (2 min) 200 nM JQ1 treatment disperses BRD4 condensates (JQ1), yet they form again quickly after washing out JQ1 (Recovery). Segmented masks of identified BRD4 puncta within nuclear outline, overlay of JQ1 and recovery timepoints (green) with pretreatment condensate positions (magenta). (J) Quantification of condensate dissolution during JQ1 treatment (shaded area) and recovery after washout. Error bars represent SD of three biological trials of 10 cells each. (K) Overlay of images before/during JQ1 treatment and before treatment/after JQ1 washout (left). PCC of 30 cells before/during JQ1, and before treatment/after JQ1 washout.

    Article Snippet: The full-length BRD4 DNA fragment was amplified by PCR from pcDNA4-TO-HA-BRD4FL (Addgene plasmid #31351) (Rahman et al., 2011) incorporated into linearized FM5 lentiviral vectors containing 12 | A. R. Strom et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell standardized linkers (generously provided by David Sanders) using the In-Fusion HD cloning kit (Takara Bio, 638910).

    Techniques: Expressing, Activation Assay, MANN-WHITNEY, Two Tailed Test, Dissolution

    FIGURE 5: Simulations of BRD4FL Corelet condensation quantify enhancement of chromatin-seeded nucleation. (A) Schematic of a typical nucleation event. τnucl is the time required for cluster size to reach the threshold to form a stable nucleus (red line). τdelay is the time required for the nucleated cluster to grow via diffusion-limited growth to reach a size that is observable under the microscope (green line), which is estimated to be 15 times larger than the stable nucleus size in our simulations. (B) Example of a heterogeneous (on-chromatin) nucleation event, in which the largest cluster (highlighted in red) interacts with the chromatin polymer. (C) Example of a homogeneous (off-chromatin) nucleation event. (D) Probability of on-chromatin (orange) or off-chromatin (blue) nucleation events for endogenous (top) and Corelet (bottom) simulations at two BRD4-histone tail interaction strengths (representing +JQ1 and −JQ1), and four acetylation fractions (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4). (E) Quantification of the nucleation rate in endogenous and Corelet simulations with (−JQ1) and without (+JQ1) strong BRD4-histone tail interactions. (F) Quantification of the delay time before observable condensates are formed in endogenous and Corelet simulation systems with (−JQ1) and without (+JQ1) strong BRD4-histone tail interactions. (E, F) Seven independent simulations for each measurement are run at an acetylation fraction of 0.4 for both +JQ1 and −JQ1. In the +JQ1 Corelet simulations, only two out of seven simulations achieved nucleation. Error bars represent the SE. ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001 by Student’s t test.

    Journal: Molecular Biology of the Cell

    Article Title: Interplay of condensation and chromatin binding underlies BRD4 targeting

    doi: 10.1091/mbc.e24-01-0046

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 5: Simulations of BRD4FL Corelet condensation quantify enhancement of chromatin-seeded nucleation. (A) Schematic of a typical nucleation event. τnucl is the time required for cluster size to reach the threshold to form a stable nucleus (red line). τdelay is the time required for the nucleated cluster to grow via diffusion-limited growth to reach a size that is observable under the microscope (green line), which is estimated to be 15 times larger than the stable nucleus size in our simulations. (B) Example of a heterogeneous (on-chromatin) nucleation event, in which the largest cluster (highlighted in red) interacts with the chromatin polymer. (C) Example of a homogeneous (off-chromatin) nucleation event. (D) Probability of on-chromatin (orange) or off-chromatin (blue) nucleation events for endogenous (top) and Corelet (bottom) simulations at two BRD4-histone tail interaction strengths (representing +JQ1 and −JQ1), and four acetylation fractions (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4). (E) Quantification of the nucleation rate in endogenous and Corelet simulations with (−JQ1) and without (+JQ1) strong BRD4-histone tail interactions. (F) Quantification of the delay time before observable condensates are formed in endogenous and Corelet simulation systems with (−JQ1) and without (+JQ1) strong BRD4-histone tail interactions. (E, F) Seven independent simulations for each measurement are run at an acetylation fraction of 0.4 for both +JQ1 and −JQ1. In the +JQ1 Corelet simulations, only two out of seven simulations achieved nucleation. Error bars represent the SE. ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001 by Student’s t test.

    Article Snippet: The full-length BRD4 DNA fragment was amplified by PCR from pcDNA4-TO-HA-BRD4FL (Addgene plasmid #31351) (Rahman et al., 2011) incorporated into linearized FM5 lentiviral vectors containing 12 | A. R. Strom et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell standardized linkers (generously provided by David Sanders) using the In-Fusion HD cloning kit (Takara Bio, 638910).

    Techniques: Diffusion-based Assay, Microscopy, Polymer

    FIGURE 6: Epigenetic acetylation level influences nucleation behaviors in endogenous and exogenous BRD4 systems. (A) Representative images and analysis examples of endogenous BRD4 puncta by immunofluorescence in cells treated with control media (Control), histone acetyltransferase inhibitor (A485), or histone deacetylase inhibitor (TSA). (B, C) Quantification of endogenous BRD4 condensate count per nucleus (B) and condensate average area (C) measured by immunofluorescence in drug-treated cells. n = 25 cells each, error is SD. ***p = 0.002, ****p = 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA. D. Representative images of BRD4FL-mCh puncta in living cells treated with control media, A485, or TSA at three timepoints: before addition of JQ1 (−JQ1), during JQ1 incubation (+JQ1) and after JQ1 washout and recovery. (E–F) Quantification of the number of condensates per nucleus in drug-treated cells before addition of JQ1 (E) and after washout and recovery (F). Expression range as defined in Supplemental Figure S4, D and E. n = 11, 11, 12 cells, error is SD, *p = 0.031, **p = 0.008 by one-way ANOVA. (G) Timecourse graph of the number of BRD4FL-mCh puncta per nucleus during JQ1 treatment (shaded area) and nucleation after washout. (H) Nucleation rate of BRD4FL-mCh puncta measured as slope after JQ1 washout. N = 11, 11, 12 for A485, control, TSA respectively. **p = 0.006, ****p = 0.001. (I) Model figure summarizing findings about on- and off-chromatin BRD4 nucleation.

    Journal: Molecular Biology of the Cell

    Article Title: Interplay of condensation and chromatin binding underlies BRD4 targeting

    doi: 10.1091/mbc.e24-01-0046

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 6: Epigenetic acetylation level influences nucleation behaviors in endogenous and exogenous BRD4 systems. (A) Representative images and analysis examples of endogenous BRD4 puncta by immunofluorescence in cells treated with control media (Control), histone acetyltransferase inhibitor (A485), or histone deacetylase inhibitor (TSA). (B, C) Quantification of endogenous BRD4 condensate count per nucleus (B) and condensate average area (C) measured by immunofluorescence in drug-treated cells. n = 25 cells each, error is SD. ***p = 0.002, ****p = 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA. D. Representative images of BRD4FL-mCh puncta in living cells treated with control media, A485, or TSA at three timepoints: before addition of JQ1 (−JQ1), during JQ1 incubation (+JQ1) and after JQ1 washout and recovery. (E–F) Quantification of the number of condensates per nucleus in drug-treated cells before addition of JQ1 (E) and after washout and recovery (F). Expression range as defined in Supplemental Figure S4, D and E. n = 11, 11, 12 cells, error is SD, *p = 0.031, **p = 0.008 by one-way ANOVA. (G) Timecourse graph of the number of BRD4FL-mCh puncta per nucleus during JQ1 treatment (shaded area) and nucleation after washout. (H) Nucleation rate of BRD4FL-mCh puncta measured as slope after JQ1 washout. N = 11, 11, 12 for A485, control, TSA respectively. **p = 0.006, ****p = 0.001. (I) Model figure summarizing findings about on- and off-chromatin BRD4 nucleation.

    Article Snippet: The full-length BRD4 DNA fragment was amplified by PCR from pcDNA4-TO-HA-BRD4FL (Addgene plasmid #31351) (Rahman et al., 2011) incorporated into linearized FM5 lentiviral vectors containing 12 | A. R. Strom et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell standardized linkers (generously provided by David Sanders) using the In-Fusion HD cloning kit (Takara Bio, 638910).

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Control, Histone Deacetylase Assay, Incubation, Expressing